The Township of Langley is yet again embroiled in controversy as Mayor Woodward pushes through a motion that would see the municipality change its approach to land agreements with the Langley school district—all without consulting the school district. The proposal has drawn sharp criticism from multiple councillors who questioned both the intent and the process behind this latest move.

The motion calls for the Township to reject the school district’s $15 million plan to expand Willoughby Elementary and instead push for a full replacement school—despite the district not requesting one. Woodward’s plan would see the Township offer up five acres of undeveloped land near Yorkson Community Park in exchange for the existing school site, with taxpayers footing the bill for any difference in land value and additional costs to construct a new facility. The proposal also suggests folding the new school into a broader community development plan, but it lacks clear cost estimates, feasibility studies, or any formal consultation with the school district.

Councillor Kim Richter was particularly vocal in her opposition, calling the motion an overreach of council’s authority. “This goes into business beyond the council’s jurisdiction,” Richter stated. “It directly impacts and infringes on the legislative responsibilities of the school board.” She emphasized that decisions regarding school planning and capital investment rest solely with the school district, not the Township. When Richter asked if district officials had been consulted about the proposal, staff confirmed that the school district was not approached.

Other councillors echoed similar concerns. Councillor Margaret Kunst questioned the transparency of the process, stating, “Does it not make anyone uncomfortable that we are negotiating land deals in a meeting?” Councillor Pratt called for consultation with the school district. Councillor Barb Martens also expressed unease, saying, “I’m uncomfortable with this.” Despite these objections, Woodward remained determined to push his motion through.

This latest move by the mayor is reminiscent of past controversies surrounding his leadership style, particularly his tendency to bypass consultation and rush significant decisions through council. As previously reported, Woodward has a history of unilateral decision-making that has alienated colleagues and raised ethical concerns.

Notably, the discussion took place over a Zoom call due to Councillor van Popta’s absence from the council chamber, a direct consequence of her dual role splitting time between Langley and Victoria. Councillor van Popta’s double dipping has repeatedly forced council meetings online, further complicating discussions on key decisions.

Adding to the controversy is the issue of cost and feasibility. Richter highlighted that the Township does not even know how much the cost ramification of this motion will be or whether the timeline is realistic. She cited past school construction projects in the community that have faced financial overruns, warning that the same issues could arise again. Yet, despite these glaring uncertainties, Woodward pushed forward without so much as a conversation with the school district.

As a major land investor and landlord himself, Mayor Woodward is no stranger to land deals in the Township. His aggressive push for control over land use in Langley has been a recurring theme throughout his tenure, often drawing scrutiny from both council members and the public.

As Langley residents grapple with Woodward’s latest controversy, one thing remains clear: his leadership continues to raise numerous red flags. This latest motion will undoubtedly further erode public trust, and with growing opposition among councillors and a lack of transparency in decision-making, the pattern of top-down governance under Woodward is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.